Correct use of transactions in SQL Server
Add a try/catch block, if the transaction succeeds it will commit the changes, if the transaction fails the transaction is rolled back:
Add a try/catch block, if the transaction succeeds it will commit the changes, if the transaction fails the transaction is rolled back:
I am trying to use transaction blocks on a SQL-Console with an Oracle DB. I''m used to use transaxction blocks in PostgreSQL like BEGIN; <simple sql statement> END; but in
The good news is a transaction in SQL Server can span multiple batches (each exec is treated as a separate batch.) You can wrap your EXEC statements in a BEGIN
Looking at the SQL Server Books Online, Microsoft seems to have an (incorrect) method of handling nested transactions in a stored procedure: Nesting Transactions Explicit
Do u think there is a better way to write a transaction in t-sql? Is there a better approach that improves maintainability and performance of the application that uses this
Participating transaction failed - marking existing transaction as rollback-only So I just stepped through my code to see where this line is generated and found that there is a
I understand how a transaction might be useful for co-ordinating a pair of updates. What I don''t understand is wrapping single statements in transactions, which is 90% of what I''ve ever seen.
I have a long running process that holds open a transaction for the full duration. I have no control over the way this is executed. Because a transaction is held open for the full duration, whe...
PDF version includes complete article with source references. Suitable for printing and offline reading.